Welcome to the Review House Archive! This section is an archive of Scott McCall's extensive, scrupulous, honest, and hard-hitting Nintendo 64 reviews. During his many years as an N64 journalist, Scott wrote his reviews in a very comprehensive and detailed style to provide you with as much information as possible to help you make your purchases. Therefore, you can rest assured that Scott's opinions are carefully thought-out and are crafted to ensure accuracy and fairness.
These descriptions represent the abbreviations used in the table columns: GR - Graphics, SO - Sound, CN - Control, GP - Gameplay, LS - Lastability (Replay Value), and OVR - Overall.
Scott's review system is based on a 1.0 to 5.0 scale.
The review scores can be generalized as follows: 5.0 - 4.5 is excellent, 4.4 - 4.0 is very good, 3.9 - 3.5 is good, 3.4 - 3.0 is decent, 2.9 - 2.5 is questionable, 2.4 - 2.0 is shoddy, and lower than 2.0 is crap.
Remember that the overall score is not always an average of the five category scores.
You should realize that each game is compared to and scored on what else was available at its release. Therefore, the later a game arrived on N64, the higher I set my standards.
Finally, the following table is sorted by release date in reverse chronological order first and then alphabetically second. You can click a column heading to sort by that category.
|
Released: | |||||||
|
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.6 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
2.7 |
Jun. 2000 | |
|
4.6 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
4.5 |
4.4 |
May. 2000 | |
|
4.8 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
4.9 |
5.0 |
4.9 |
May. 2000 | |
|
4.5 |
3.0 |
4.4 |
4.5 |
4.7 |
4.5 |
Mar. 2000 | |
|
4.3 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
Mar. 2000 | |
|
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
Mar. 2000 | |
|
2.4 |
3.4 |
3.2 |
2.9 |
3.3 |
3.0 |
Feb. 2000 | |
|
3.9 |
4.5 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
3.1 |
4.1 |
Dec. 1999 | |
|
3.0 |
2.8 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
Dec. 1999 | |
|
3.8 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
Dec. 1999 | |
|
3.5 |
2.5 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
3.7 |
Dec. 1999 | |
|
2.5 |
2.8 |
3.5 |
3.2 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
Nov. 1999 | |
|
3.3 |
3.8 |
3.4 |
3.0 |
2.2 |
3.0 |
Nov. 1999 | |
|
3.8 |
4.1 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
Nov. 1999 | |
|
4.2 |
4.0 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.5 |
3.8 |
Nov. 1999 | |
|
4.5 |
4.7 |
3.4 |
4.3 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
Oct. 1999 | |
|
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
3.1 |
3.9 |
Sep. 1999 | |
|
3.6 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
3.7 |
4.0 |
Sep. 1999 | |
|
3.4 |
2.7 |
3.5 |
3.4 |
2.9 |
3.2 |
Sep. 1999 | |
|
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
2.5 |
3.4 |
Sep. 1999 | |
|
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.4 |
2.8 |
3.4 |
Sep. 1999 | |
|
2.7 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
2.3 |
Aug. 1999 | |
|
3.5 |
4.8 |
4.5 |
4.7 |
5.0 |
4.7 |
Aug. 1999 | |
|
3.3 |
2.3 |
3.1 |
2.8 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
Jul. 1999 | |
|
3.9 |
3.7 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
Jul. 1999 | |
|
3.8 |
3.1 |
4.4 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
Jun. 1999 | |
|
2.8 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
3.8 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
Jun. 1999 | |
|
1.9 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
2.6 |
2.1 |
Jun. 1999 | |
|
4.7 |
4.2 |
3.7 |
4.3 |
4.1 |
4.2 |
Jun. 1999 | |
|
1.8 |
2.0 |
4.2 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.2 |
Mar. 1999 | |
|
3.4 |
4.3 |
3.4 |
4.1 |
3.0 |
3.9 |
Jan. 1999 | |
|
4.1 |
3.3 |
3.7 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
Dec. 1998 | |
|
3.9 |
3.4 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
4.0 |
Nov. 1998 | |
|
4.8 |
4.5 |
3.5 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
Nov. 1998 | |
|
4.0 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
3.4 |
3.9 |
3.6 |
Nov. 1998 | |
|
4.7 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
5.0 |
4.5 |
4.9 |
Nov. 1998 | |
|
3.6 |
3.9 |
3.4 |
4.3 |
3.4 |
3.9 |
Oct. 1998 | |
|
1.7 |
1.4 |
2.3 |
2.8 |
2.6 |
2.4 |
Oct. 1998 | |
|
3.0 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
Oct. 1998 | |
|
4.6 |
4.7 |
4.4 |
4.5 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
Oct. 1998 | |
|
4.0 |
3.8 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
3.5 |
4.1 |
Oct. 1998 | |
|
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.7 |
2.9 |
3.4 |
Sep. 1998 | |
|
3.3 |
4.1 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
3.8 |